zitadel/internal/integration/assert.go
Tim Möhlmann d2e0ac07f1
chore(tests): use a coverage server binary (#8407)
# Which Problems Are Solved

Use a single server instance for API integration tests. This optimizes
the time taken for the integration test pipeline,
because it allows running tests on multiple packages in parallel. Also,
it saves time by not start and stopping a zitadel server for every
package.

# How the Problems Are Solved

- Build a binary with `go build -race -cover ....`
- Integration tests only construct clients. The server remains running
in the background.
- The integration package and tested packages now fully utilize the API.
No more direct database access trough `query` and `command` packages.
- Use Makefile recipes to setup, start and stop the server in the
background.
- The binary has the race detector enabled
- Init and setup jobs are configured to halt immediately on race
condition
- Because the server runs in the background, races are only logged. When
the server is stopped and race logs exist, the Makefile recipe will
throw an error and print the logs.
- Makefile recipes include logic to print logs and convert coverage
reports after the server is stopped.
- Some tests need a downstream HTTP server to make requests, like quota
and milestones. A new `integration/sink` package creates an HTTP server
and uses websockets to forward HTTP request back to the test packages.
The package API uses Go channels for abstraction and easy usage.

# Additional Changes

- Integration test files already used the `//go:build integration`
directive. In order to properly split integration from unit tests,
integration test files need to be in a `integration_test` subdirectory
of their package.
- `UseIsolatedInstance` used to overwrite the `Tester.Client` for each
instance. Now a `Instance` object is returned with a gRPC client that is
connected to the isolated instance's hostname.
- The `Tester` type is now `Instance`. The object is created for the
first instance, used by default in any test. Isolated instances are also
`Instance` objects and therefore benefit from the same methods and
values. The first instance and any other us capable of creating an
isolated instance over the system API.
- All test packages run in an Isolated instance by calling
`NewInstance()`
- Individual tests that use an isolated instance use `t.Parallel()`

# Additional Context

- Closes #6684
- https://go.dev/doc/articles/race_detector
- https://go.dev/doc/build-cover

---------

Co-authored-by: Stefan Benz <46600784+stebenz@users.noreply.github.com>
2024-09-06 14:47:57 +02:00

155 lines
5.0 KiB
Go

package integration
import (
"testing"
"time"
"github.com/pmezard/go-difflib/difflib"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
"google.golang.org/protobuf/encoding/protojson"
"google.golang.org/protobuf/proto"
"google.golang.org/protobuf/types/known/timestamppb"
resources_object "github.com/zitadel/zitadel/pkg/grpc/resources/object/v3alpha"
)
// Details is the interface that covers both v1 and v2 proto generated object details.
type Details interface {
comparable
GetSequence() uint64
GetChangeDate() *timestamppb.Timestamp
GetResourceOwner() string
}
// DetailsMsg is the interface that covers all proto messages which contain v1 or v2 object details.
type DetailsMsg[D Details] interface {
GetDetails() D
}
type ListDetails interface {
comparable
GetTotalResult() uint64
GetTimestamp() *timestamppb.Timestamp
}
type ListDetailsMsg[L ListDetails] interface {
GetDetails() L
}
type ResourceListDetailsMsg interface {
GetDetails() *resources_object.ListDetails
}
// AssertDetails asserts values in a message's object Details,
// if the object Details in expected is a non-nil value.
// It targets API v2 messages that have the `GetDetails()` method.
//
// Dynamically generated values are not compared with expected.
// Instead a sanity check is performed.
// For the sequence a non-zero value is expected.
// If the change date is populated, it is checked with a tolerance of 1 minute around Now.
//
// The resource owner is compared with expected.
func AssertDetails[D Details, M DetailsMsg[D]](t assert.TestingT, expected, actual M) {
wantDetails, gotDetails := expected.GetDetails(), actual.GetDetails()
var nilDetails D
if wantDetails == nilDetails {
assert.Nil(t, gotDetails)
return
}
assert.NotZero(t, gotDetails.GetSequence())
if wantDetails.GetChangeDate() != nil {
wantChangeDate := time.Now()
gotChangeDate := gotDetails.GetChangeDate().AsTime()
assert.WithinRange(t, gotChangeDate, wantChangeDate.Add(-time.Minute), wantChangeDate.Add(time.Minute))
}
assert.Equal(t, wantDetails.GetResourceOwner(), gotDetails.GetResourceOwner())
}
func AssertResourceDetails(t assert.TestingT, expected *resources_object.Details, actual *resources_object.Details) {
if expected.GetChanged() != nil {
wantChangeDate := time.Now()
gotChangeDate := actual.GetChanged().AsTime()
assert.WithinRange(t, gotChangeDate, wantChangeDate.Add(-time.Minute), wantChangeDate.Add(time.Minute))
}
if expected.GetCreated() != nil {
wantCreatedDate := time.Now()
gotCreatedDate := actual.GetCreated().AsTime()
assert.WithinRange(t, gotCreatedDate, wantCreatedDate.Add(-time.Minute), wantCreatedDate.Add(time.Minute))
}
assert.Equal(t, expected.GetOwner(), actual.GetOwner())
assert.NotEmpty(t, actual.GetId())
if expected.GetId() != "" {
assert.Equal(t, expected.GetId(), actual.GetId())
}
}
func AssertListDetails[L ListDetails, D ListDetailsMsg[L]](t assert.TestingT, expected, actual D) {
wantDetails, gotDetails := expected.GetDetails(), actual.GetDetails()
var nilDetails L
if wantDetails == nilDetails {
assert.Nil(t, gotDetails)
return
}
assert.Equal(t, wantDetails.GetTotalResult(), gotDetails.GetTotalResult())
if wantDetails.GetTimestamp() != nil {
gotCD := gotDetails.GetTimestamp().AsTime()
wantCD := time.Now()
assert.WithinRange(t, gotCD, wantCD.Add(-10*time.Minute), wantCD.Add(time.Minute))
}
}
func AssertResourceListDetails[D ResourceListDetailsMsg](t assert.TestingT, expected, actual D) {
wantDetails, gotDetails := expected.GetDetails(), actual.GetDetails()
if wantDetails == nil {
assert.Nil(t, gotDetails)
return
}
assert.Equal(t, wantDetails.GetTotalResult(), gotDetails.GetTotalResult())
assert.Equal(t, wantDetails.GetAppliedLimit(), gotDetails.GetAppliedLimit())
if wantDetails.GetTimestamp() != nil {
gotCD := gotDetails.GetTimestamp().AsTime()
wantCD := time.Now()
assert.WithinRange(t, gotCD, wantCD.Add(-10*time.Minute), wantCD.Add(time.Minute))
}
}
// EqualProto is inspired by [assert.Equal], only that it tests equality of a proto message.
// A message diff is printed on the error test log if the messages are not equal.
//
// As [assert.Equal] is based on reflection, comparing 2 proto messages sometimes fails,
// due to their internal state.
// Expected messages are usually with a vanilla state, eg only exported fields contain data.
// Actual messages obtained from the gRPC client had unexported fields with data.
// This makes them hard to compare.
func EqualProto(t testing.TB, expected, actual proto.Message) bool {
t.Helper()
if proto.Equal(expected, actual) {
return true
}
t.Errorf("Proto messages not equal: %s", diffProto(expected, actual))
return false
}
func diffProto(expected, actual proto.Message) string {
diff, err := difflib.GetUnifiedDiffString(difflib.UnifiedDiff{
A: difflib.SplitLines(protojson.Format(expected)),
B: difflib.SplitLines(protojson.Format(actual)),
FromFile: "Expected",
FromDate: "",
ToFile: "Actual",
ToDate: "",
Context: 1,
})
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
return "\n\nDiff:\n" + diff
}